When this is useful
- You need a blower-door result or a baseline for improvement.
- Drafts, cold rooms, or a missed airtightness target need evidence.
- Corrections can still be made before finishes close access.
Diagnostics
Blower door testing to quantify leakage and support airtightness decisions across Alberta.
Fit and next step
The quote request can start with the service selected. Files are still optional at intake.
Illustrative workflow
Illustrative workflow showing how a mid-construction check can surface air-barrier and insulation-continuity risks before finishes.
Read more
Related resource
Airtightness is more than a score. Here’s how to interpret it and how to use it to make real improvements.
Read more
A blower door test gives you a measured leakage result under controlled pressure conditions. The number creates a baseline; the surrounding context makes it useful. Building type, project stage, attached geometry, and the reason for testing all affect how the result should be read.
The scope can stay simple when only a documented result is needed, or add diagnostic work when the decision depends on where air is moving.
Share the building type, current project stage, reason for testing, and any target or documentation requirement already known. Note attached units, access limits, active construction, or previous test results. Drawings and earlier reports are helpful when available, but intake can begin without them.
One result does not locate every leak or explain every comfort problem. Distribution, ventilation, weather, access, and construction conditions may also matter. Any program, permit, or label decision stays with the responsible authority; this scope provides measurement and supporting context.
Request a quote with the building type, location, stage, and the decision the result needs to support. We can then confirm whether a result-only test or a diagnostic scope is the leaner fit.
FAQ
Related services
These pairings reflect the existing service map and keep the page focused on adjacent decisions, not extras.
Diagnostics
Pressure-assisted thermal investigation to identify leakage pathways and envelope anomalies.
Diagnostics
Mid-construction envelope checks to catch continuity issues before finishes hide them.
Diagnostics
Assembly and transition review to identify continuity risks and practical correction opportunities.
Related resources
These links stay close to the topic so the next conversation starts with context, not blank paper.
ghg / emissions
Why two upgrades with similar energy savings can have different emissions impacts—and how to compare pathways.
thermography / diagnostics
Pressure-assisted thermal imaging is powerful—but only when conditions and scope fit.
Start with the right route
Mark drawings as ready in the intake. After it is saved, use the private upload control if offered; otherwise follow-up will coordinate the handoff.