Kates EnergyDiagnostics, modelling, complianceChoose a Path

Case study

Mid-construction envelope check that prevented rework

Builder support scope that caught air barrier and insulation continuity risks before finishes—reducing the cost of correction.

Context

  • Project type: Residential new construction
  • Stage: Mid-construction (pre-finish)
  • Primary goal: Reduce risk of airtightness misses and comfort complaints

The problem

Key transitions and penetrations were approaching “hard-to-access” once finishes were installed. The builder wanted a targeted review while corrections were still efficient.

Our approach

  • On-site envelope inspection focused on continuity
  • Prioritized list of issues by impact and ease of correction
  • Notes aligned to trade sequencing

What we delivered

  • Photo-referenced punch list
  • Clear “fix-first” priorities
  • Recommendations for follow-up verification timing

Outcome

The builder had a clear correction plan before finishes, reducing the likelihood of late-stage rework and post-occupancy complaints.

Next steps

Follow-up verification after corrections, plus documentation capture for installed conditions.

Start with the right route

Separate new service requests from decision support and active-project help.

Use the routing page first when you already have a report, already have contractor quotes, or the file is already in motion.