When this is useful
- You need measured evidence before choosing corrective work.
- The building stage makes access, sequencing, or verification important.
- Comfort, leakage, or envelope questions need more than a visual opinion.
Diagnostics
Pressure-assisted thermal investigation to identify leakage pathways and envelope anomalies.
Fit and next step
The quote request can start with the service selected. Files are still optional at intake.
Related case study
A comfort complaint investigation that identified likely leakage pathways and guided practical corrective work.
Read more
Related resource
Pressure-assisted thermal imaging is powerful—but only when conditions and scope fit.
Read more
Thermography is most useful when it is used with pressure and context, not as a photo hunt. The goal is to find pathways that help explain comfort issues, envelope problems, or unexpected leakage.
It is not a replacement for scope discipline, and it is not a promise that every issue will show up in one pass.
Related services
These pairings reflect the existing service map and keep the page focused on adjacent decisions, not extras.
Diagnostics
Blower door testing to quantify leakage and support airtightness decisions across Alberta.
Diagnostics
Assembly and transition review to identify continuity risks and practical correction opportunities.
Diagnostics
Mid-construction envelope checks to catch continuity issues before finishes hide them.
Related resources
These links stay close to the topic so the next conversation starts with context, not blank paper.
ghg / emissions
Why two upgrades with similar energy savings can have different emissions impacts—and how to compare pathways.
airtightness / blower-door
Airtightness is more than a score. Here’s how to interpret it and how to use it to make real improvements.
Start with the right route
Use the routing page first when you already have a report, already have contractor quotes, or the file is already in motion.